Reinventing history....

Moderator: CrazyChick

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:02 pm

He isn't a fool and wouldn't be so obvious.....

Would he?...






You have naculars....

Now there's a thing....
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

Postby Louis » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:05 pm

Well, I calls a spade a spade...... :)
Louis
 

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:08 pm

Rather than a....

Club....
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

Postby Louis » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:11 pm

LadySnowcat wrote:Rather than a....

Club....

Or,

A digging implement....you know the sort of thing, what teams use to dig themselves into a hole....
Louis
 

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:15 pm

Ahhh....

You mean a....





Photocopier....


Or an.....



E mail......
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

Postby Louis » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:26 pm

Talking of emails, I guess we are all expecting Alfonso's evidence to be against Macca. It may not be!
Louis
 

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:27 pm

Of course....

That would be why they cancelled the appeal....


Sorry NF1....
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

Postby Louis » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:33 pm

LadySnowcat wrote:Of course....

That would be why they cancelled the appeal....


Sorry NF1....

Sure will be interesting just what comes out in the hearing...
Louis
 

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:34 pm

Unfortunately although the appeal was to be open to the Press the WMSC hearing isn't....

Hmmm....
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

Postby Louis » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:37 pm

LadySnowcat wrote:Unfortunately although the appeal was to be open to the Press the WMSC hearing isn't....

Hmmm....

But, the findings will be made known.
If Macca win, they will crow so loud, as will Fiat and each will want to rub the others nose in it..... :lol:
Louis
 

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:40 pm

In reality there are no winners in this process....
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

Postby Louis » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:50 pm

LadySnowcat wrote:In reality there are no winners in this process....

Yes, but, on a good note, Jenson seemed to have a good race..... :D
Louis
 

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 6:58 pm

Brill....

Excellent performance Jense...
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

Postby Pepper » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 7:33 pm

NoneF1-Fan wrote:Talking of emails, I guess we are all expecting Alfonso's evidence to be against Macca. It may not be!


Thats a fair point, I hadn't thought that way.

It is possible that his evidence would support Maccas case.....
User avatar
Pepper
Moderator
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Tue 26 Dec, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: jonesy's

Postby LadySnowcat » Sun 09 Sep, 2007 7:42 pm

Then there would have been no reason to convene the WMSC....

Or reason to insist the drivers comply...

It would all have been presented at the first hearing...
Lady Snowcat
User avatar
LadySnowcat
Moderator
 
Posts: 13176
Joined: Thu 09 Nov, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: England

PreviousNext

Return to 2007 Racing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron